<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>New Media + IT &#187; Businesses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/category/businesses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia</link>
	<description>A tech journalist's news and views on the world of the web and end user software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:51:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Microsoft investing in Facebook?</title>
		<link>http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/2007/09/24/microsoft-investing-in-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/2007/09/24/microsoft-investing-in-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lars K Jensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/2007/09/24/microsoft-investing-in-facebook/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just saw that The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Microsoft might be very interesting in investing in social startup Facebook.
Facebook has &#8212; according to the WSJ &#8212; 40 million users, and Microsoft (and apparently also Google) is now trying to grab a piece of the action.
Microsoft&#039;s approach to Facebook in recent weeks with proposals [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just saw that The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Microsoft might be very interesting in <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119065193646437586.html?mod=djemTECH" target="_blank">investing in social startup Facebook</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com" target="_blank">Facebook</a> has &#8212; according to the WSJ &#8212; 40 million users, and Microsoft (and apparently also Google) is now trying to grab a piece of the action.</p>
<blockquote><p>Microsoft&#039;s approach to Facebook in recent weeks with proposals to invest in the fast-growing site is part of the software giant&#039;s effort to catch up with the Internet rival Google. If successful, Microsoft&#039;s talks with Facebook could give it an up-to-5% stake in the closely-held startup—a stake potentially valued at roughly $300 million to $500 million, the people familiar with those talks said.</p>
<p>The people familiar with the matter said that the discussions are still preliminary and Facebook could wind up not taking an investment from either Microsoft or Google. Factors in the discussions include the valuation the suitors would offer to Facebook and other business considerations they could contribute to sweeten any deal.</p></blockquote>
<p>I wonder if there&#039;s anything else than an increase in Facebook&#039;s value in store for us, if either Microsoft or Google starts to invest in a company like Facebook. Some time ago Rupert Murdoch <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4695495.stm" target="_blank">snatched</a> <a href="http://www.myspace.com" target="_blank">MySpace</a> &#8212; the far biggest social site/community.</p>
<p>In the past years Google and Microsoft have been in an internetish &#034;battle of the titans&#034;. Things might get a lot more interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/2007/09/24/microsoft-investing-in-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Web 2.0 growing up?</title>
		<link>http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/2007/09/20/is-web-20-growing-up/</link>
		<comments>http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/2007/09/20/is-web-20-growing-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lars K Jensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/2007/09/20/is-web-20-growing-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to The Wallstreet Journal more companies are spending more money in the field of &#034;Web 2.0&#034; (we SO need to come up with another term for that) &#8212; mostly social networking or blogging.
Also the investments in Web 2.0 companies has started to move outside the San Francisco Bay Arena which is &#034;known for producing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to The Wallstreet Journal more companies are spending more money in the field of &#034;Web 2.0&#034; (we SO need to come up with another term for that) &#8212; mostly social networking or blogging.</p>
<p>Also the investments in Web 2.0 companies has started to move outside the San Francisco Bay Arena which is &#034;known for producing some of the most high-profile Internet companies&#034;.</p>
<p>In the first half of 2007 New England topped the Bay Arena with $102 million invested dollars, Bay Arena had $90.5 million.</p>
<p>Also companies are becoming better at investing in web companies:</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119017472849832220.html" target="_blank">Read the article at WSJ.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/2007/09/20/is-web-20-growing-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yet another Yahoo acquisition: MyBlogLog</title>
		<link>http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/2007/01/09/yet-another-yahoo-acquisition-mybloglog/</link>
		<comments>http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/2007/01/09/yet-another-yahoo-acquisition-mybloglog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lars K Jensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/2007/01/09/yet-another-yahoo-acquisition-mybloglog/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have previously written about Yahoo acquisitions in 2005 and 2006, and now Yahoo has been out buying again.
This time it&#039;s MyBlogLog a service aiming to connect like-minded bloggers in communities. You just add your blog by typing in the URL/URI. Apparently MyBlogLog also has a built in statistics module, that requires you to add [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have previously written about <a href="http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/2007/01/05/yahoo-acquisitions-in-2005-and-2006/" target="_blank">Yahoo acquisitions in 2005 and 2006</a>, and now Yahoo has been out buying again.</p>
<p>This time it&#039;s <a href="http://www.mybloglog.com/" target="_blank">MyBlogLog</a> a service aiming to connect like-minded bloggers in communities. You just add your blog by typing in the URL/URI. Apparently MyBlogLog also has a built in statistics module, that requires you to add a single JavaScript to your blog.</p>
<p>Read more about Yahoo&#039;s acquisition of MyBlogLog:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/08/yahoo-buys-mybloglog-no-they-didnt-wait-yes/" target="_blank">at Techcrunch</a></li>
<li><a href="http://news.com.com/2061-10811_3-6148405.html?part=rss&#038;tag=2547-1_3-0-5&#038;subj=news" target="_blank">at CNET News</a></li>
<li><a href="http://gigaom.com/2007/01/08/yahoo-buys-mybloglog-for-real/" target="_blank">at Om Malik&#039;s blog</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/2007/01/09/yet-another-yahoo-acquisition-mybloglog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo acquisitions in 2005 and 2006</title>
		<link>http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/2007/01/05/yahoo-acquisitions-in-2005-and-2006/</link>
		<comments>http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/2007/01/05/yahoo-acquisitions-in-2005-and-2006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 09:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lars K Jensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/2007/01/05/yahoo-acquisitions-in-2005-and-2006/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CyberNet News has an article on Yahoo Acquisitions Over the Last Two Years.
The article sums up two years of interesting Yahoo acquisitions, seven in 2005 and three in 2006.
I can honestly say that there are some acquisitions in there, that I haven&#039;t heard anything about.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CyberNet News has an article on <a href="http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/04/yahoo-acquisitions-over-the-last-two-years/trackback/" target="_blank">Yahoo Acquisitions Over the Last Two Years</a>.</p>
<p>The article sums up two years of interesting Yahoo acquisitions, seven in 2005 and three in 2006.</p>
<p>I can honestly say that there are some acquisitions in there, that I haven&#039;t heard anything about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/2007/01/05/yahoo-acquisitions-in-2005-and-2006/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A European charter for online movies?</title>
		<link>http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/2006/05/24/a-european-charter-for-online-movies/</link>
		<comments>http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/2006/05/24/a-european-charter-for-online-movies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 09:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lars K Jensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/2006/05/24/a-european-charter-for-online-movies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently the European Union has just announced a &#034;European Charter for Film Online endorsed by major industry players&#034;.
This sounds quite interesting.
In the press announcement it says:
This Charter – the first of its kind in the world – identifies the preconditions for enabling content and infrastructure providers to make film online services a commercial success. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently the European Union has just <a href="http://europa.eu.int/information_society/newsroom/cf/itemshortdetail.cfm?item_id=2662" target="_blank">announced</a> a &#034;European Charter for Film Online endorsed by major industry players&#034;.</p>
<p>This sounds quite interesting.</p>
<p>In the <a href="http://europa.eu.int/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/06/672&#038;format=HTML&#038;aged=0&#038;language=EN&#038;guiLanguage=en" target="_blank">press announcement</a> it says:</p>
<blockquote><p>This Charter – the first of its kind in the world – identifies the preconditions for enabling content and infrastructure providers to make film online services a commercial success. The Charter will serve as reference for future commercial agreements as well as for a broader Content Online policy of the European Commission.</p></blockquote>
<p>I haven&#039;t read the charter yet, therefore I&#039;m unable to write anything about its content.</p>
<p><strong>Courtesy links:</strong><br />
<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/comm/avpolicy/docs/other_actions/film_online_en.pdf" target="_blank">Read the charter</a> (English, PDF, 12 pages)<br />
<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/comm/avpolicy/docs/other_actions/charter_participants_en.pdf" target="_blank">View the list of the endorsing companies and organisations</a> (English, PDF, 1 page)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/2006/05/24/a-european-charter-for-online-movies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nothing to smile about at AOL</title>
		<link>http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/2006/05/24/nothing-to-smile-about-at-aol/</link>
		<comments>http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/2006/05/24/nothing-to-smile-about-at-aol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 07:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lars K Jensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web-portals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/2006/05/24/nothing-to-smile-about-at-aol/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Economist has an article about America Online (AOL), where the various problems and difficulties with the firm, the brand, the shares and the customers are discussed.
The article argues, that Time Warner, who owns AOL, might be considering to break off the AOL-branch of the business.
Read the article, it&#039;s interesting, and very important, stuff!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Economist has an <a href="http://economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm?story_id=6952043" target="_blank" title="The Economist article &quot;From :-) to :-(&quot;">article</a> about <a href="http://www.aol.com" target="_blank">America Online (AOL)</a>, where the various problems and difficulties with the firm, the brand, the shares and the customers are discussed.</p>
<p>The article argues, that Time Warner, who owns AOL, might be considering to break off the AOL-branch of the business.</p>
<p><a href="http://economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm?story_id=6952043" target="_blank">Read the article</a>, it&#039;s interesting, and very important, stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogcentral.dk/newmedia/2006/05/24/nothing-to-smile-about-at-aol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
